February 28, 2012 • 10:49 am
So before I gave up on the trappings of academia (given that I work four days a week non-academically and have a PhD to complete by next summer I’ve decided to abandon conferences/papers/any hope of publication to facilitate actually finishing) I wrote a short review article of the McSweeney’s website via the theme of ‘brevity’ for the Dandelion postgrad journal. It’s up on their site now, at the bottom of the page, fittingly. It annoyed me how tricky I found it to fit my thoughts into such a short space, and reading it back now it has little (although one or two moments) of the actual interest I have in the website as a pseudo-literary space. This is evidence of the PhD pressure constricting my thoughts, hence contributing to said abandonment of anything that is not the PhD itself.
Filed under: mcsweeneys
October 10, 2011 • 11:47 am
Your Roast Potatoes.
Would you rather.
We are throwing a pot-luck party.
I have started sending other poems to magazines. This is excitary.
Filed under: mcsweeneys
Since I last blogged I have been: working; teaching; finishing teaching; sort of doing my PhD; Tumbling; going on small holidays; living in New York for a month; cycling; staring — those kind of things.
Over at my shop blog there’s some stuff about Bookfest; series of bookish events I put on in Oxfam. Was fun and interesting and productive. Must remember to try and do more.
Have been writing my PhD as much as I can.
Have been writing poetry, which is a new thing for me. I have been continually calling it “poetry” but I am going to stop doing that. If you want to read one, go to my Tumblr. I have a small set of poems I am working on. I am going to revise them and then think about if I want to send them to magazines I like.
In line with this new interest I have been attending more poetry events. Last Tuesday I went to the third Selected Poems event at the V&A Reading Rooms, hosted by Alex MacDonald and Stop Sharpening Your Knives. Here are some photos from that event:
Read the rest of this entry »
Filed under: miscellaneous
March 31, 2011 • 10:40 pm
So my class on postmodernism was on the postmodern short story and one of the big lessons I wanted them to take away from it is that we should move away from a reading position that looks for ‘meaning’ and switch to something more critical about ‘how we arrive at meaning’ so my idea with the class was to remove myself from the position of authority and let the group determine its own approach to the topic. My way of signalling this was to sit in the seats among them instead of standing at the front of the class. It freaked some of them out right away so that was good in that just a simple thing like my position in the room makes them more aware of their environment. In the first group I told them that I wasn’t going to give them any tasks but that they had to fill the next fifty minutes. They looked scared! I made some jokes to relax them. Then I speculated on some options for things they could do like talk in one big group or break into smaller groups or draw pictures on the board or stand up and read out one of the stories and someone hesitantly said ‘I think we should talk about the stories in groups?’ and others nodded and they broke into two groups and divided the stories among themselves. I was a member of both groups and there was some interesting discussion and though this did not feel particularly ‘postmodern’ it was useful that they had made a decision themselves which is not something they ordinarily do. The second group was more interesting. I did the ‘trick’ again of sitting in the ‘wrong’ place. I asked them why I had done this and someone said ‘to mess with us’ and I laughed. Then I told them to follow that idea through into thinking what the class would be and the same person said ‘I know what you want me to say but if I say it then people won’t like me’ and then they said ‘We are going to lead the class’ and I was like ‘yesssssss’. I was more ‘postmodern’ in this class in that I said things like ‘this sentence is me telling you that I am not going to guide the discussion, and in about 30 seconds I am going to stop talking for a minute and if no-one speaks then I will say something else but I hope someone speaks’ and so someone in about 20 seconds said ‘I think I’d like to talk about the Babysitter’ meaning the Robert Coover story that was one of the texts for today. About five students of the nine in the class then conducted a good discussion of the aesthetics of the story and the difficulty in understanding ‘what happened’. I occasionally interjected to tell them they were doing something interesting and then made it ‘postmodern’ by saying ‘I am performing the role of a seminar leader here and now I am going to stop talking again’. Those comments usually led to a momentary cessation of the discussion but it always started back up again. The conversation moved across different topics including the syllabus of another course that they do that is about the ‘canon’ and people were being critical of the idea of the ‘canon’ and trying to reconcile the ‘postmodern’ with it and I was feeling warm and fuzzy and thinking ‘they’re doing it they’re really doing it!’ and I tried to express this by saying things out loud like ‘this is the point of your education’ and ‘if you are dissatisfied with it then that means you’re also actually satisfied with it’ and I feel like the class was genuinely useful and positive and that it achieved what I thought it would achieve.
Filed under: teaching