November 8, 2009 • 10:15 pm 0
This guy is talking about the oppressive nature of the media. A truck controlled by some people with computers crashes into Bruce Willis and the guy. They change the traffic lights. Does this mean he is right? Are we supposed to distrust the media now? What kind of ideology is it advocating? What image of America does it represent?
Filed under: miscellaneous
October 30, 2009 • 10:26 am 0
I listened to the In Our Time podcast on Schopenhauer on my cycle to Goldsmiths today. I enjoyed it. I did not know much about him before. They talked about human endeavour fluctuating between boredom and desire. They mentioned the pain associated with both of these. They said he thought compassion was a way out of this. This resonates with things I’ve been thinking about lately. They said he picked up “compassion” as a philosophical strand from Buddhism. About recognising the “will” of another. The Anthony Doerr story in McSweeney’s 32 is about being subject to the literal thoughts of another. This compassion changes the behaviour of both the subjected character and the original character in interesting ways.
Filed under: mcsweeneys
October 26, 2009 • 4:43 pm 0
Some notes/comments/quotes/etc.
Each story in this is set in 2024. The editorial says that this is designed to give a more realistic focus to what can be seen at times as science fiction. To connect it closer to us. Fifteen years in the future. This sounds both sensible and patronising.
With cover illustration from the incredibly awesome Robyn O’Neil.
Filed under: mcsweeneys
October 22, 2009 • 1:41 pm 0
So Penguin aren’t going to publish the McSweeney’s quarterly in the UK anymore.
This makes sense for a number of reasons, not least because, as Joe Pickering (Penguin publicist) says on Twitter, no-one was buying them.
Here are some more comments from Joe, and thoughts and other stuff that have occurred to me.
Filed under: mcsweeneys
|
